Y O U . . .
Have The Key To Make Any and All Changes Necessary To Help The Animals !!
People just do not realize the potential we have by giving just a bit of our day to doing something different in lieu of the same or related thing. It actually opens up various avenues that leads to the same goals. Some of these newly discovered venues will be noticeable improvements from the road taken by everyone else. We just have to be open to change, smart enough to recognize when change is necessary and determined enough to make a few of these changes in spite of the conflicts from others. Ignoring these new avenues is the simple largest factor in the animal movement not moving forward in a more productive manner.
I find the today that the politicians do not look at things the way we do. Even one of the county commissioners in Champaign County, Ohio, told me straight up "we do not have time for animal problems - we have human problems which are more important. At least that is all we hear from our constituents. I hear that from my working partners in politics all around the nation as well. Because the animal people are so busy working on today's animals which stem from yesterday's problems, they don't take the time to recognize that it is actually tomorrow that can and will make the changes that everyone really wants." It's not through the large animal organizations that anything of any measurable amount can be achieved. I believe that has been proven substantially over the decades.. With the ever growing number of communities across the nation who are killing 80% of the animals that come into the city or county run pounds, how many of them have actually been approached by one of the larger animal orgs offering guidelines or financial assistance to make the necessary changes in local laws, implementing a humane education program or changing the elected officials to garner the necessary support required for these plans to work?
Politicians forget who out they in office - the people - and the people have concerns (when they learn about them) in which they are interested. They really do listen to the voters - it is, afterall, how they secure re election votes. If enough people around the nation had suddenly begun to believe that the color red has negative properties and that blue was the better alternative, you better bet your last dollar that any and every candidate across this nation would be seen with blue in their outfit - completely void of any red.
Politicians need to be educated as well. They are always looking for ways to save money. So, it's up to us to show them the facts. In New Hampshire, a statewide program cut the cost of neutering pets to $10 for poor residents. The state saved $3 in animal control costs for every $1 spent on the program. And it saved animals' lives. Over an eight-year period between 1993 and 2001, the state recorded a nearly 75 percent drop in the number of dogs and cats killed. Cities that manage to stem their animal kill rates don't stop with sterilization. They often pair those services with extensive public education. Those efforts let the public know the size of the problem and what happens to thousands of unwanted pets every year. Cities have taken out billboards, allowed euthanasias to be recorded and shown by news media, and walked shelter dogs wearing the dates they'll be killed if they aren't adopted.
2004 is an election year. The question I hear most is "are you pro life or pro choice?" This is a good question for people running for national office, our U.S. Senates and U.S. Congressman. It has nothing to do with state, county and local government. Why are we not asking the state, county and local politicians if they are in favor of humane education in our schools and if they favor adoption programs as opposed to euthanasia of animals?. These are issues that state, county and local politicians have say over. Clearly, if these two topics were hammered into their heads now, they would appear in their platforms for election campaigns later on. "We don't think we need to shock the community by showing them 50 dead animals," The city of Charlotte, then took on a more gentle approach and it was a downright pure undeniable failure. $4 million a year to catch, house and kill animals, it has done little to address the cause of the problem. When a local group convinced one of the network TV stations to air live euthanasia during their eve news each night for a full week, the message was clear and they experienced a drastic decrease of 50% in the following weeks that continued until a new program could be implemented.
Elected officials do everything in their power not to upset any voter or offend any one of their constituents. It may cost them votes. So, it will become very clear as to which ones are actually 'on board' with saving the animals by their actions.
Clearly stated by a county commissioner in Mohave County Arizona, if everyone in rescue and/or animal rights would ask these questions of their local politicians, we would change the face of local government. Clearly, there are millions and millions of people involved in rescue and rights across the nation. If we all voted for candidates who are in tune with our issues, we could change the face of local government. His brother is in government in another state as well as his brother in law. They would both tell everyone the same thing.
People do not realize the power that is within their grasp. This is what I think would do more that anything else. If the animal people would just simply assert themselves to the elected officials and state two things clearly, not only would they have a say in the government's decisions since the politicians want to be re-elected, they would actually see those changes come about. They (the animal people ) would actually have more of a voice in the government than any lobbying effort known today - including the NRA and others combined.
The two things would be to enforce and clean up existing animal protection laws and the implementation of a mandatory humane education curriculum in our schools. There is no other way to start the ball rolling. If the next generation grows up with the same ignorance that this generation has grown up with, then not only are rescuers going to be facing the same level of unwanted animals in the shelters around the nation and on the streets, they will likely be facing even more since the population is growing.
Example: From 1992 to 2002, Americans spent over $20billion on animal protection related taxes and donations to various organizations to protect and solve. We are talking about millions and millions of people involved here. How much can you honestly point to on a nationwide scale that is a noticeable change resulting from these tremendous figures? Reason? Each effort is singular in nature, non communicative of other efforts, many times duplicated in corruptive overlaps and many times this combination simply fails to fill in the gaps that would make these efforts more cohesive and successful.
Cities and counties which have seen successful results and saved tax-payers dollars as well have all implemented the following programs:
* Increase sterilizations and public education, especially in low-income areas.
• Increase the number of animals adopted from the shelter.
• Embed microchips in animals who leave the shelter so, if they're picked up as strays, the owners can be identified.
• Trap and neuter feral cats.
• Help pet owners train their adopted animals so they don't develop behavioral problems and get returned to the shelter.
Once we elect governments in tune with the issues, we can confront them and educate them that spending millions of dollars in shelter contract and euthanasia projects is money should be use for public education and no-kill shelter facilities. Maybe a little expensive at first but will pay for itself in the near future.
Example Clark County, Nevada is spending 1.2 million a year to run the current shelter. The new contact for 2005 (20 year contract) is 1.6 million per year. Multiply that by every shelter or pound in this nation. Yes, some have smaller budgets but the major cities are spending a lot more just to kill the animals. 2002 the city of Las Vegas and Clark County euthanized 24,500 animals. This county has no humane education in the schools at any level. So they will always be facing this same problem. This county also has no plan to attempt to adopt out more dogs and cats through programs that other cities have successfully implemented, so they are not operating anything less than a facility to kill animals. Clark County is Las Vegas. To spend this amount of funding on nothing more than killing animals is an unconscionable waste of life and a needless drain on public money." Not one of the animal orgs came forward with an offer to help or any real life suggestions. They are all worried about yesterday's problems today and securing funding to stay afloat.
Local and national projects of educating the children is very important. Neither of these ideas takes money. They only take communication and persistence to educate those who can and will make these issues become laws that are sensible and enforceable. These ideas then become law at the voting booth. Plain and simple.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
A NEW APPROACH TO EDUCATION
A NEW APPROACH TO ANIMAL RIGHTS/ ANIMAL WELFARE ACTIVISM
Looking around us, we often want to think that things are getting better for nonhuman animals thanks to the work of the many organizations, groups and individuals defending the consideration of their interests as sentient beings. But we tend to see everything done "for the animals" as something positive that will make people change their attitudes towards them. This, far from being true, is the last nail in the coffin for this movement and the animals defended by it. A lack of reflection and criticism has driven us to a point at which we are often considered lunatics or emotional freaks. Due to the actual situation of the animal rights movement in terms of strategy, tactics and effectiveness, a new perspective on the issue appears to be necessary.
First of all, I want to express my support to all of those who fight against the exploitation, killing, or use of sentient creatures. Although I show certain disagreements with certain views, methods, or campaigns, I do not underestimate the efforts, good intentions, or work of those carrying them out. Everyone really wanting to help animals should be happy to be criticized so that they can analyze their work better and decide if they can improve what they are doing. It is very sad to see that the most widespread attitude towards criticism is: "If you don't like it, don't do it. You do your thing; I'll do mine." That way, the movement will never develop.
Also, there are things that can be counterproductive, which can affect the work of others, and thus animals. So, if someone is doing something that might damage this cause, we should not shut up. Also, if someone has an idea that could improve our effectiveness, her/his comments should be welcomed, not simply ignored or dismissed without any real consideration. Nobody is perfect, and we constantly do things that could be done in a better way. Lots of times we notice it ourselves after a while, but sometimes we just don't think of it until someone says it. Accepting you were doing something wrong (or simply that you could have done it better) doesn't mean accepting you are a bad or stupid person. What actually shows a lack of wisdom is to think that everything you do is fine and that there is nothing for you to change. Wise people realize they can always do things better and evolve constantly to improve their effectiveness.
Urging advocates to get out and learn what others are doing, to see the whole picture and then act accordingly. Only working diligently to save today's animals is simply a waste of time, effort and resources that will only guarantee that millions and billions of animals in years to come will simply suffer the same fate at the hands of humans. Discussing problems we need to overcome such as:
---Changing the moral concept of animals in society
---Attacking the root, not the branches
---The problems arise when people attack or discriminate against AW or AR. Usually through a total misunderstanding of what each is wanting to do.
---Creating unnecessary enemies, assuming our way is the only means of accomplishing our goals,
---Failing to become involved and to court the local and county government's elected officials.
Additional pages on this site that shed light on similar ideas to help move this effort forward are found at www.21stcenturycares.org/whyvote.htm and www.21stcenturycares.org/whyorganize.htm as well as www.21stcenturycares.org/potential.htm All provide eye-opening support for the incredible need to group and become more involved.
|
Looking around us, we often want to think that things are getting better for nonhuman animals thanks to the work of the many organizations, groups and individuals defending the consideration of their interests as sentient beings. But we tend to see everything done "for the animals" as something positive that will make people change their attitudes towards them. This, far from being true, is the last nail in the coffin for this movement and the animals defended by it. A lack of reflection and criticism has driven us to a point at which we are often considered lunatics or emotional freaks. Due to the actual situation of the animal rights movement in terms of strategy, tactics and effectiveness, a new perspective on the issue appears to be necessary.
First of all, I want to express my support to all of those who fight against the exploitation, killing, or use of sentient creatures. Although I show certain disagreements with certain views, methods, or campaigns, I do not underestimate the efforts, good intentions, or work of those carrying them out. Everyone really wanting to help animals should be happy to be criticized so that they can analyze their work better and decide if they can improve what they are doing. It is very sad to see that the most widespread attitude towards criticism is: "If you don't like it, don't do it. You do your thing; I'll do mine." That way, the movement will never develop.
Also, there are things that can be counterproductive, which can affect the work of others, and thus animals. So, if someone is doing something that might damage this cause, we should not shut up. Also, if someone has an idea that could improve our effectiveness, her/his comments should be welcomed, not simply ignored or dismissed without any real consideration. Nobody is perfect, and we constantly do things that could be done in a better way. Lots of times we notice it ourselves after a while, but sometimes we just don't think of it until someone says it. Accepting you were doing something wrong (or simply that you could have done it better) doesn't mean accepting you are a bad or stupid person. What actually shows a lack of wisdom is to think that everything you do is fine and that there is nothing for you to change. Wise people realize they can always do things better and evolve constantly to improve their effectiveness.
Activists should have a deeper look at the issue and see the great power they have to change things on a larger scale. It is understandable that seeing animals suffering in front of us is very difficult to cope with, but those who are not there for us to see are probably hidden because they are suffering much more. And the fact that we don’t see something doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
Still, trying to achieve nonhuman-animal liberation this way seems not only terribly slow but impossible. And let's not forget that those saved animals need attention, which makes many activists spend their time taking care of a few animals instead of saving millions by campaigning (and the same goes for the large sums of money spent on sanctuaries).
We must not lose perspective, and we shall choose those campaigns that will save more animals in the long run. The animals who exist today are a very tiny percentage of the animals who will be killed and tortured in the coming centuries and millennia. Paying excessive attention to those who suffer today is condemning millions more to suffer the same fate. We can’t save them all, but let’s save all the ones we can!
Campaigns such as the ones mentioned are wasting enormous amounts of money, activists, time, and other resources in promoting not the egalitarian treatment of all sentient beings. Not surprising to anyone who actually made it through the entire article, there is simply no better manner of getting more people involved or teaching the masses what they obviously do not know than through humane education. This, my friends, is most useful and effective in our schools, yet most simply cannot see the forest for the trees.
Still, trying to achieve nonhuman-animal liberation this way seems not only terribly slow but impossible. And let's not forget that those saved animals need attention, which makes many activists spend their time taking care of a few animals instead of saving millions by campaigning (and the same goes for the large sums of money spent on sanctuaries).
We must not lose perspective, and we shall choose those campaigns that will save more animals in the long run. The animals who exist today are a very tiny percentage of the animals who will be killed and tortured in the coming centuries and millennia. Paying excessive attention to those who suffer today is condemning millions more to suffer the same fate. We can’t save them all, but let’s save all the ones we can!
Campaigns such as the ones mentioned are wasting enormous amounts of money, activists, time, and other resources in promoting not the egalitarian treatment of all sentient beings. Not surprising to anyone who actually made it through the entire article, there is simply no better manner of getting more people involved or teaching the masses what they obviously do not know than through humane education. This, my friends, is most useful and effective in our schools, yet most simply cannot see the forest for the trees.
Remember, our primary goal is to save as many animals as possible. That cannot be achieved if the major focus is on today's animals. We need to recognize the millions and billions of animals yet to be born that are simply ignored until it's almost too late for most of them. That in itself shows incredible ignorance on the part of humans.
I hope no one feels offended by the comments in this article and that everyone understands that my only intention is to improve the movement to end all exploitation, use, or killing of beings with the ability to suffer and to enjoy life.
Many activists often say that AR and AW groups should work together and not criticize one another. Indeed, there are many groups who call themselves AR and constantly carry out AW campaigns or use AW arguments (e.g., referring to the regulations not being followed in farms or labs, workers causing animals "unnecessary" pain, anesthetics not being used, cages being dirty or small...).
So-called welfarism is the main enemy of AR. You just need to talk to people on the street to find out that there is practically no one saying, "I don't give a damn about animals suffering in factory farms, or in experiments, or during slaughter." Instead, the most common comment is "Oh, yes! This way of treating animals is horrible. But there are farmers who have them on fields and kill them humanely, and experimenters who use anesthetics…" Many others also say, "I know everything about it; I only buy free-range."
Very few people agree with "outright cruelty." What we have to make clear is that it is unfair to breed, use, or kill someone for your own purposes without his/her consent. And, in light of the practical impossibility of being certain about consent in the case of nonhumans, the idea that they can consent must be completely ruled out.
No one can ever say s/he is on the animals’ side when stating that it is acceptable to kill or breed them as long as you do it nicely. It is true that many people that use welfarist methods do actually think that the use of animals should be abolished, but they find their way of campaigning a more effective way of achieving that goal. Nevertheless, for the public, the strategy you follow, and not your objectives, is the idea they have of you. This means that what people understand of a welfarist campaign is that it is fine to use animals if you do it carefully and "humanely." And then, although personally many of us might feel close to those campaigners, publicly we need to oppose them, as they justify the utilization of sentient creatures (or, at least, that is what the public will understand).
Animals are not property; they are not resources. They are individuals with an interest in living their lives, and doing so free from pain, exploitation, or coercion imposed by other actors. Our interest in not being subjected to suffering comes from our ability to feel pain and discomfort. Our interest in living, and doing it in freedom, is due to our ability to feel pleasure and joy. When we die, our interest in not suffering disappears, as we don't suffer when dead. But all our chances of experiencing any further joy or pleasure are ended. That is why all sentient creatures with the ability to feel positive experiences must have the right to live. This should be added to the right to live painlessly and freely (the lack of freedom causes suffering and doesn't allow pleasurable activities to be carried out).
To reach a situation in which public awareness means that fewer animals are killed or exploited is a step towards animal liberation. However, although a change such as animals being killed with less pain or bred in better conditions is not something we should oppose, we must not be the ones to promote it.
Many activists call themselves "animal lovers" and tell others to love animals instead of killing them. This is quite inappropriate, as you can't ask others to feel one thing or another; all that is needed is for people to respect them and to leave them alone. Also, by talking about love instead of justice, we make AR seem like a sentimental issue instead of a very important ethical question. Actually, most people who come up to stalls and say they love animals appear to eat meat or defend vivisection for medical research.
It is more important to teach others that animals matter in themselves and that the fact of harming them is wrong in itself, because they are sentient, not because it is bad for us. Suggesting that the problem of “animal abuse” is that it causes abuse of humans is plain anthropocentrism.
I hope no one feels offended by the comments in this article and that everyone understands that my only intention is to improve the movement to end all exploitation, use, or killing of beings with the ability to suffer and to enjoy life.
Many activists often say that AR and AW groups should work together and not criticize one another. Indeed, there are many groups who call themselves AR and constantly carry out AW campaigns or use AW arguments (e.g., referring to the regulations not being followed in farms or labs, workers causing animals "unnecessary" pain, anesthetics not being used, cages being dirty or small...).
So-called welfarism is the main enemy of AR. You just need to talk to people on the street to find out that there is practically no one saying, "I don't give a damn about animals suffering in factory farms, or in experiments, or during slaughter." Instead, the most common comment is "Oh, yes! This way of treating animals is horrible. But there are farmers who have them on fields and kill them humanely, and experimenters who use anesthetics…" Many others also say, "I know everything about it; I only buy free-range."
Very few people agree with "outright cruelty." What we have to make clear is that it is unfair to breed, use, or kill someone for your own purposes without his/her consent. And, in light of the practical impossibility of being certain about consent in the case of nonhumans, the idea that they can consent must be completely ruled out.
No one can ever say s/he is on the animals’ side when stating that it is acceptable to kill or breed them as long as you do it nicely. It is true that many people that use welfarist methods do actually think that the use of animals should be abolished, but they find their way of campaigning a more effective way of achieving that goal. Nevertheless, for the public, the strategy you follow, and not your objectives, is the idea they have of you. This means that what people understand of a welfarist campaign is that it is fine to use animals if you do it carefully and "humanely." And then, although personally many of us might feel close to those campaigners, publicly we need to oppose them, as they justify the utilization of sentient creatures (or, at least, that is what the public will understand).
Animals are not property; they are not resources. They are individuals with an interest in living their lives, and doing so free from pain, exploitation, or coercion imposed by other actors. Our interest in not being subjected to suffering comes from our ability to feel pain and discomfort. Our interest in living, and doing it in freedom, is due to our ability to feel pleasure and joy. When we die, our interest in not suffering disappears, as we don't suffer when dead. But all our chances of experiencing any further joy or pleasure are ended. That is why all sentient creatures with the ability to feel positive experiences must have the right to live. This should be added to the right to live painlessly and freely (the lack of freedom causes suffering and doesn't allow pleasurable activities to be carried out).
To reach a situation in which public awareness means that fewer animals are killed or exploited is a step towards animal liberation. However, although a change such as animals being killed with less pain or bred in better conditions is not something we should oppose, we must not be the ones to promote it.
Many activists call themselves "animal lovers" and tell others to love animals instead of killing them. This is quite inappropriate, as you can't ask others to feel one thing or another; all that is needed is for people to respect them and to leave them alone. Also, by talking about love instead of justice, we make AR seem like a sentimental issue instead of a very important ethical question. Actually, most people who come up to stalls and say they love animals appear to eat meat or defend vivisection for medical research.
It is more important to teach others that animals matter in themselves and that the fact of harming them is wrong in itself, because they are sentient, not because it is bad for us. Suggesting that the problem of “animal abuse” is that it causes abuse of humans is plain anthropocentrism.
$50 Million will change the face of education and civilization forever.
A one-time expenditure of $50 million would bring humane education to our nations' schools
Due to the fact that I am not only proposing a philosophical conceptual framework regarding the effectiveness of Humane Education, but I am also a practitioner applying my theory within practical contexts, I consider myself an action researcher. In other words, I don’t only provide the rationale and philosophical underpinnings of my work, I actually go out there and apply it hands on. Furthermore, I am collaborating with professional researchers who are capable of taking my findings (i.e. data) and analyzing and interpreting those findings (i.e. scientifically based research).
Although Americans have been donating a billion dollars annually to their favorite animal protection group (that's AFTER the nearly one billion they also pay in taxes for local and area animal control efforts) for over 25 years, we still see few tangible results. I am so determined to prove that my idea is a likely solution to many if not most of our problems, that I have outlined it to the best of my ability. We may need to include in this budget the cost for professional research to offer the educators, who don't care about humane education but do care about science, math and reading test scores, that our program can improve all of the above.
So, with $2 billion each year going mainly to salaries, condos, jet planes, office buildings and printing costs to raise more funds for next year, I'm asking for just $50 million on a one time basis to start this idea rolling on a nationwide scale that will undoubtedly prove its cause worthy. However, thus far, I've not even been able to fill the $50 million costs.
Each State would receive money for advertising in all newspapers that serve communities of 20,000 residents or more. These stats would be from the most recent census. The ads would be larger than the average ad to garner attention. With this endeavor, it is hoped that we would gain substantial media attention as well - helping to further our cause of gaining the attention of all those who believe in humane education and would be willing to volunteer in some way.
I would like to incorporate this within my tour if possible. My presence in cities, when I have five big dogs that are traveling with me across country, usually gets front page photo coverage and several other interviews on TV news, etc.
I'd have several packages of information to send out. I would also send one for the person who is organizing the program (i.e. Program Coordinator) and another for the people who would actually go into the schools with me. My informational packet would outline every possible need and the steps to take. Therefore, I would be responsible for long distance calls, printing, envelopes and postage costs. Obviously, I need the funds to complete these tasks.
These funds could also include supplying people with some travel expenses or a post office box rental, etc. It would be very important to assure the continuation of the local marketing for volunteers for up to two years after the initial local programs begin for simple attrition. We would want them to run this as a volunteer 'business' and to become non profit. From that point on, they could be named anything they wanted and continue getting grants at will.
NOBODY anywhere is doing anything along these lines at all.Everyone is too wrapped up in their own little efforts (noble, but highly individualized) to really recognize the need for change or the importance of having a human being who will actully address tomorrow's decision makers is person with some 'live aides' to make it interesting. MOST EVERY ''humane education'' organization is still just a bunch of paper pushers. They offer materials on their website, but that is no guarantee ANYONE is reading it or putting it to use. Others pride themselves by sending thousands and thousands of copies of an animal magazine to schools. Still no real proof that they are being read by any students. All are supportive of Humane Education and will do class presentations when asked, but don't go looking for them and many even charge for their services.
We'll use 100 communities in each state for a guideline and simplification for this time.
COSTS:
The simple breakdown of costs is provided below:
50 states times 100 communities = 5,000 community newspapers. Each with an ad in their main paper every Sunday for 50 weeks. That is 250,000 ads to run with each ad running $100. That's $25 million right there.
The simple breakdown of costs is provided below:
50 states times 100 communities = 5,000 community newspapers. Each with an ad in their main paper every Sunday for 50 weeks. That is 250,000 ads to run with each ad running $100. That's $25 million right there.
Packages of info:
Brochure costs: $3 each (copies of additional info included cost would be $2 each). Envelopes would cost an additional 50 cents each and postage would be $1, totaling $6.50
Brochure costs: $3 each (copies of additional info included cost would be $2 each). Envelopes would cost an additional 50 cents each and postage would be $1, totaling $6.50
Each city would need up to 10 of the start up packages. That is $ 325,000. Each city could ask for up to 100 volunteer kits at $8 each (additional info included from start up) $4million
I would still need to add in long distance phone charges and other miscellaneous items. My tour will cost $175,000 including motor home, gas, insurance, printing and food. After the tour, I can donate the motor home or resell it to get some money back.
I would still need to add in long distance phone charges and other miscellaneous items. My tour will cost $175,000 including motor home, gas, insurance, printing and food. After the tour, I can donate the motor home or resell it to get some money back.
Follow-up marketing for ads in newspapers to cover attrition and misc expenses would be included $12million (half of the original $25million)
Total so far is only $42million.
Access to any and all information distributed would be available online from my site. No charge.
I don't want to ask for a penny that I won't need. I want to CLEARLY PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that humane education has its place in a civilized society and that it has benefits that are visible within 5 years of start up and even more at the ten year span.
THE HISTORY OF HUMANE EDUCATION
THE HISTORY OF HUMANE EDUCATION
by Merrit Clifton
The Unti/DeRosa chapter on humane education is the most thorough treatment we have seen yet of the rise and fall of humane education as a movement unto itself during the early 20th century. The Bands of Mercy organized by Massachusetts SPCA founder George Angell and successors eventually reached more than four million children with an ambitious equation of humane education with moral education.
Broadly accepted then, including in denouncing hunting and vivisection, the Bands of Mercy program would now be considered too radical for school use.
After the outbreak of WW I, The message of universal peace through humane education was subordinated to patriotic imperatives. Humane education did not become more central to the work of SPCA's in the years that followed.
Instead, as humane societies took on animal control duties to ensure economic survival, the growing burden of capturing and killing homeless dogs and cats, cast other initiatives, including humane education, to the margins of activity. What survived was the simple lessons of kindness to pets.. Both self censorship and the constraints imposed by educational institutions, prevented humane education from reaching into the realm of institutionalized use of animals, such as animal experimentation and the mass production of animals for food and fur.
More than half of the Unti/DeRosa chapter dwells on the difficulty of quantifying the effects of humane education, reflecting the contemporary obsession with the meeting standards with can be verified through testing. But humane education has had one verifiable success, Unti and DeRosa conclude: "Whatever the level of success on other fronts of humane work, wanton acts of individual cruelty against pets are now usually seen as the signs of a maladjusted and sick personality.
Conversely, a kind disposition toward such animals is considered an important attribute of the well adjusted individual.
Actually, British satirical engraver William Wogarth among others, counted on his audience to have similar views long before there were any humane societies.
However, schoolroom humane education has probably help to validate and empower the feelings of the majority of people who disapprove of cruelty. A series of surveys done in China since 1998 show that attitudes toward cruelty to animals there are essentially the same as in the US, - but in China, because people who disapprove of cruelty are conspicuous, especially by the minority of the population who eat dogs and cats and wildlife and by those who attend zoos as spectacles rather than from the love of animals.
Saturday, June 1, 2013
RELIGIOUS RESOURCES ON HUMANE EDUCATION
Protecting the Modern "Noah's Ark"A $1 million campaign of print, television, and radio advertisements to urge Congress to keep the Endangered Species Act has been launched by the Evangelical Environmental Network (EEN) on behalf of more than 1,000 churches nationwide.Calvin DeWitt, co-founder of the network and an environmental studies professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, said, "The Endangered Species Act allows not only for the preservation of the species but of their homes." He called the act "the Noah's Ark of our day." Formed in 1993 as part of Evangelicals for Social Action, the EEN's current campaign counters the perception that conservative Christians are often at odds with environmentalists, DeWitt said. He hoped to mobilize an estimated 30 million to 50 million evangelicals by distributing 30,000 "Creation Care" packets across the country, urging church members to participate in local nature preservation activities and to organize as "Noah congregations." The EEN has affiliates that include a group of 88 evangelical colleges and the Intervarsity Christian Fellowship, with a membership of 27,000 students on nearly 600 campuses and several other Christian groups for young people. Evangelicals for Social Action, a theologically conservative but politically liberal group, has been addressing social questions since the 1970s. The group is part of a larger effort spearheaded by the National Religious Partnership for the Environment, joining different religious traditions with secular environmentalism. Providing the financial backing is the Environmental Information Center, a Washington-based nonprofit group formed in early 1995 to work on environmental issues with religious, scientific, consumer and health groups that are not primarily part of environmental movement. Quoting from the book of Genesis, DeWitt said the story of Noah and the Ark is "the first endangered species act proclaimed in written history." Its conclusion, DeWitt noted, is a covenant with the creator to sustain all life. ARTICLES THE HOLOCAUST CONTROVERSY: How and why the fate of animals and the fate of humans were linked together DOMINION: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals and the Call to Mercy....An overview of the book that has broken through media barriers to reach the general public. Is Vegetarianism a Virtue? Is Carnivorism A Vice?...Can the eating of flesh become an anomaly in our Western culture? JESUS, OVID, AND VEGETARIANISM: Was the Christ less compassionate than the Pagan? THE CARNIVOROUS SHEPHERDS: The Prophets Zechariah and Ezekiel condemned those who ate the flesh of sheep. JESUS, THE MONEYCHANGERS & ANIMAL SACRIFICE. The moneychangers were not the target of Christ's outrage. THE POPE AND THE HOMELESS CATS: John Paul II Had A Dream.... ANIMAL RIGHTS: Contemporary Concern or Ongoing Issue?...........From the keynote address given at the 7th annual EarthCare Conference. RELIGION: FRIEND OR FOE OF ANIMAL ACTIVISM....by Richard H. Schwartz, Ph.D, author of "Judaism and Vegetarianism." EASTERTIME AND THE LAMBS OF GOD. Warning: this article may be offensive to carniverous Christians The Christmas Story: Glad Tidings for All Creatures THE IMMORALITY OF WEARING FUR...Buying, selling or wearing fur manages to violate three of the ten commandments GOD'S COVENANT WITH ANIMALS: excerpts from the newly published book written by the editor of Humane Religion publications. God and Chick-fil-A Claiming that it is God who has made you prosperous, doesn't make it so. BOOK BONUS: Read the first chapter of THEY SHALL NOT HURT OR DESTROY: Animal Rights and Vegetarianism in the Western Religious tradition. Written by Vasu Murti, this book has been endorsed by ministers, rabbis and representatives of animal rights organizations like PETA and THE FUND FOR ANIMALS. AQUINAS, ANIMAL RIGHTS & CHRISTIANITY: The spiritual ignorance and prejudice of long-dead men continues to make life a hell-on-earth for animals. "His Eye Is On The Sparrow"....Not a sparrow falls to earth without God's knowledge and concern. ANIMAL SACRIFICE IN CHRISTIAN CHURCHES.....Animal sacrifices are currently taking place and there are no plans to stop them. JESUS - ESSENES - DEAD SEA SCROLLS: The Dead Sea Scrolls give information about the kind of world in which Jesus lived. THE COMPASSIONATE PAGAN: Spiritual understanding takes root wherever it finds fertile ground. ALBERT SCHWEITZER: His Christianity embraced and served all God's creatures. ON KILLING CARROTS: In a sermon heard 'round the world, a Christian minister equates eating plants with eating animals. SPIRITUAL PIONEERS: Animal Activists as Spiritual Pioneers. An Editorial by J.R.Hyland. LIFE ATER DEATH: Animals And Humans, together in heavenly places ANIMAL SACRIFICE: Both Jews and Christians support the restoration of Temple sacrifices in Jerusalem HOMO SAPIENS: Was Adam created to be master of creation or was he a caretaker/gardener? ECOLOGY AND CHRISTIAN ACTIVISTS: The Christian concern for environmental causes is not animal-friendly. AFTER THE FALL: GENESIS 3:21: Does Genesis 3:21 really portray God as the world's first murderer? KILLING IN JONESBORO: An editorial by J. R. Hyland - From the May/June 1998 issus of Humane Religion THE LION WHO LAY DOWN WITH THE LAMB. The True Story Of A Vegetarian Lion. SLAUGHTER OF THE INNOCENT. The relationship between the sacrifice of animals at the Jerusalem Temple, and the crucifixion of Jesus. JEWS, CHRISTIANS, AND HUNTING. When it comes to the matter of hunting, there is a wide divergence between Jewish and Christian tradition. GOD'S COVENANT WITH ALL CREATURES. Both Ministers and scholars ignore God's covenantal relationship with animals. WHY METHUSELAH LIVED SO LONG. The Bible posits a relationship between longevity and vegetarianism. ANIMAL AND HUMAN COMPANIONS. The book of Genesis tells us that animals were expressly created by God as companions for human beings. THE BIBLICAL BASIS OF VEGETARIANISM. Carnivorism represents just as much of a fall from Grace as does any other sin. THE NEW MAN? When killing animals is represented as an opportunity for spiritual growth. THE ROAD LESS TRAVELLED: One Man's Journey To A Compassionate Lifestyle. Notes:
Resources
Ahimsa
All Creatures All Creatures Sermons Atheists for Animal Rights Biospirituality Blessed Are the Merciful Canadian Society of Christian Philosophers
Catholic-Animals
For those interested in joining the religious animal rights movement, resources which
may be helpful are listed below.Christian Response Worldwide Christian Vegetarian Association Compassionate Spirit EarthCare, Inc. Essene Nazarean Church Hallelujah Acres Healing Our World Healthy For Him Humane Religion International Network for Religion and Animals (INRA), P.O. Box 77591, Washington, DC 20013-7591. Publications, videos, and resource kits for all major religions can be obtained from INRA. Videos: Fox, Michael. Animals, Nature and Religion. Washington: The Humane Society of the United States (2100 L Street, Washington, DC 20037. Also available through INRA). Regan, Tom. We are All Noah. Raleigh: Culture and Animals Foundation (CIN Services, Inc., 3509 Eden Croft Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609. Also available through INRA). Books: Hyland, J. R. The Slaughter of Terrified Beasts -- a Biblical Basis for the Humane Treatment of Animals. Sarasota: Viatoris Ministries, 1988. Linzey, Andrew. Christianity and the Rights of Animals. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1987. Linzey, Andrew, and Tom Regan, eds. Animals and Christianity -- A Book of Readings. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1988. Linzey, Andrew, and Tom Regan, eds. Love the Animals -- Meditations and Prayers. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1989. McDaniel, Jay B. Of God and Pelicans -- A Theology of Reverence for Life. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1989. Regan, Tom, ed. Animal Sacrifices -- Religious perspectives in the use of animals in science. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986. Regan, Tom, and Andrew Linzey, eds. Song of Creation -- An Anthology of Poems in Praise of Animals. Basingstoke, UK: Marshall, Morgan and Scott Publication Ltd, 1988. Sobosan, Jeffrey G. Bless the Beasts -- A Spirituality of Animal Care. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1991.
All Things Herriot:
James Herriot and His Peaceable Kingdom Sanford V. Sternlicht All That Dwell Therein Tom Regan Angel Animals: Exploring Our Spiritual Connection With Animals Allen and Linda Anderson Animal Grace: Entering a Spiritual Relationship with Our Fellow Creatures Mary Lou Randour, Susan Chernak McElroy Animal Life in Nature, Myth and Dreams Elizabeth Caspari Animal Meditations: Shamanic Journeys with your Spirit Allies Nicki Scully, Angela Werneke Animal Rights and Ecology in Islam Assad N. Busool Animal Rights and Souls in the Eighteenth Century Aaron V. Garrett (Editor) Animal Right and Wrongs: A Biblical Perspective J.A Sargent Animal Rites: Liturgies of Animal Care Andrew Linzey
Animal Sacrifice in Islam
M.I. Siddiqui Animal-Speak: The Spiritual & Magical Powers of Creatures Great & Small Ted Andrews Animal Spirits Nicholas J. Saunders Animal Spirits the Shared World Sacrific Nicholas J. Saunders Animal Theology Andrew Linzey Animals and Trinitarian Doctrine: A Study in the Theology of Karl Barth Andrew Linzey Animals on the Agenda: Questions About Animals for Theology and Ethics Andrew Linzey, Dorothy Yamamoto (Editors) Bestiary for St. Jerome: A Study of Animal Symbolism in European Religious Art Herbert Freidmann The Bible According to Noah: Theology as If Animals Mattered Gary Kowalski Bless the Beasts: A Spirituality of Animal Care Jeffrey G. Sobosan Can a Darwinian Be a Christian?: The Relationship Between Science and Religion Michael Ruse Cat, Dog and Horse Lectures, and “The Beyond” Barbara Hannah Circles of Compassion: A Collection of Humane Words and Work by Elaine Sichel (Editor) Cold Noses at the Pearly Gates Gary Kurz Compassion for All Creatures: An Inspirational Guide for Healing the Ostrich Syndrome Janice Gray Kolb, Robert Kolb (Editor) Dominion of Love: Animal Rights According to the Bible Norm Phelps Dominion: The Power of Man, The Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy Matthew Scully Earth Prayers From Around the World: 365 Prayers, Poems, and Invocation for Honoring the Earth Elizabeth Roberts and Elias Amidon Familiars: Animal Powers of Britain Anna Franklin God Barking in Church: And Further Glimpses of Animal Welfare Eilleen Gardner Galer, Gregory J. Kroitzsh (Editor) God’s Covenant with Animals: A Biblical Basis for the Humane J.R. Hyland God’s Messengers: What Animals Teach Us about the Divine Allen and Linda Anderson Good Eating: The Christian Practice of Everyday Life Stephen H. Webb Good News For All Creation Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D., Nathan Braun Good News for Animals? Christian Approaches to Animal Well-Being Charles Pinches, Jay B. McDaniel (Editor) The Hidden Powers of Animals: Uncovering the Secrets of Nature Karl P. N. Shuker Is God a Vegetarian?: Christianity, Vegetarianism and Animal Rights Richard Alan Young, Carol J. Adams Judaism and Animal Rights: Classical and Contemporary Responses Roberta Kalechofsky (Editor)
Judaism and Vegetarianism
Richard H. Schwartz, Ph.D. The Lost Religion of Jesus Keith Akers Love, Miracles, and Animal Healing: A Veterinarian’s Journey from Physical Medicine to Spiritual Understanding Allen M. Schoen, Pam Proctor Nature Spirits and Elemental Beings Marko Pogacnik Of Gods and Pelicans: A Theology of Reverence for Life Jay Byrd McDaniel, John B. Cobb, Jr. On God and Dogs: A Christian Theology of Compassion for Animals Stephen H. Webb Peace to All Beings: Veggie Soup for the Chicken's Soul Judy McCoy Carman Power Animal Meditations: Shamanic Journeys With Your Spirit Allies Nicki Scully, Angela Werneke (Illustrator) Religious Vegetarianism: From Hesiod to the Dalai Lama Kerry Walters, Lisa Portmess (Editors) The Resurrection of the Animals Anita Skeen
Returning to Eden:
Animal Rights and Human Responsibility Michael W. Fox Science and the Search for God Gary Kowalski The Slaughter of Terrified Beasts: A Biblical Basis for the Humane Treatment of Animals J.R. Hyland The Soul of the Wolf Michael W. Fox, DVM Souls of Animals Gary Kowalski, Art Wolfe (Photographer) The Specter of Speciesism: Buddhist and Christian Views of Animals Paul Waldau
Thou Shalt Not Hurt or
Destroy
Vasu Murti To Cherish All Life: A Buddhist View of Animal Slaughter and Meat Eating Philip Kapleau, Roshi P. Kapleau Veggie Soup for the Chicken’s Soul: Shameless Visions and Prayers for World Peace, Inner Peace, and Animal Liberation Judy McCoy Carman The Way of Compassion Martin Rowe, Editor
============================================================
|
EVEN RELIGION HAS IT'S PLACE IN HUMANE EDUCATION
HUMANE RELIGION
A CHALLENGE TO ANY AND ALL WHO SHARE, PREACH, TEACH, BELIEVE IN AND FOLLOW THE TEACHINGS OF THE BIBLE. HELP YOUR LOCAL COMMUNITY AND CONGREGATION TO FIND IMPROVED MEANS OF PROVIDING THE PROPER AND APPROPRIATE CARE FOR THEIR ANIMALS. STOP THE UNNECESSARY SLAUGHTER OF OUR PETS. YOU CAN ALL SAY 'IT'S NOT OUR PLACE' OR 'THE BIBLE SAYS IT VERY CLEARLY' OR WHAT EVER EXCUSE YOU WANT TO USE. BUT YOU KNOW GOD HAS PLACED YOU HERE ON A MISSION. A MISSION THAT IS BY NO MEANS LIMITED TO HUMANS, BUT FOR ALL CREATURES - OF WHICH WE ARE BUT ONE.
* What religious leaders must consider and understand
*The benefits of humane education to rid our society of hatred and betrayal by Dr. Jeanette Shutay Ph.d.
* Letter to the 'God Squad' by Joseph Pastore of H.E.A.R.T. in NYC
* A Challenge for all religious leaders
*The Ten Commandments of Animal Guardianship
*Animal Protection Issues wheel
I am sometimes asked why I spend so much time and efforts on animal related issues when there is so much insensitivity towards man. I answer....."I'm working at the roots"! George T. Angell
With the teachings in the bible that clearly show reverence and respect for ALL living beings, it saddens me to see so many people - people who 'claim' to be God-fearing and who also consider religion to play a sizable role in their lives, mistreat, neglect and basically abuse their companion animals.
I live in Dolan Springs, Arizona. The local community has it's responsible pet guardians, but by no means are they the majority. Far from it. The average Dolan Springs household with pets is ripe with neglect, ignorant of the pets needs, barron of any training or even proper restraints for the pets safety. And don't even get me started on the appropriate identification of the pets - hundreds of which roam freely with little regard from their human counterpart as to where they are vs where they should be.
So, then why in the world, would the religious teachers, ministers and those who believe the bible's teachings, refuse to use this incredible tool of faith, to help clean up our problems of pet overpopulation and especially animal abuse?
IT'S SAD THAT DOGS DON'T LIVE AS LONG AS WE DO. BUT, I SEE WHY NOW. THEY ALREADY KNOW HOW TO GIVE UNCONDITIONAL LOVE AND AFFECTION - SOMETHING IT TAKES HUMANS 7 TIMES AS LONG TO LEARN!!
The largest majority of those who are causing harm are not doing it maliciously, but out of simple ignorance. This is what makes me believe that the church could and should play a role in the education of our community. If we had a rash of rapes in the recent past, there would be a sermon on respect for the opposite sex. If there were an unusually large number of murders over the past year, we would hear a sermon on respect for life and so on. So, why, when God makes it so very clear that animals and humans are all to be respected and treated with kindness and compassion, is this topic so ignored when the problem is so obvious?
There is a definite reason why Noah built the Arc for the animals and no additional humans were invited.
Humane Education, at its roots, has benefits that are felt far and wide in improved behavior of students, increased attendance, much more awareness of others, a noticeably raised level of achievement scores, more respectful nature of addressing adults and others around them and gaining a less violent resolution technique when challenged - not to mention the obvious - the lives that are spared and provided with the proper treatment that will extend their lives in a healthier, happier way.
So, if the above reasons do not spur the preachers and priests on to a more compassionate style of ministries or simple common sense isn't enough for the local or national ministries to take notice and begin giving more appropriate sermons to their listeners, maybe some of the following articles can convince them to give a humane style sermon at least once a year. If their followers are truly respectful of God and his teachings, they will learn how to improve their pets existence as well - giving the pets a noticeably improved chance of living out a healthy life in a manner pleasing the man above.
"I looked at all the caged animals in the shelter....the castoffs of human society. I saw in their eyes love and hope, fear and dread, sadness and betrayal. And I was angry. "God" I said, 'this is terrible! Why don't you do something?" God was silent for a moment and then He spoke softly. "I have done something'' He replied. "I created you. "
I think all clergy should read Matthew Scully's book "Dominion."
He addresses all these issues and very well done.
TO All Religious Leaders:
by Dr. Jeanette Shutay, Ph.d.
First of all, I want to make it known that I take neglect of animals, abuse of animals and all types of this behavior very seriously. I would also like to mention that fact that those who are physically abusive to animals tend to be more violent than average, in general (e.g., in all domains of life). Let me give you some specific examples that support this supposition.
The Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAP) is an instrument which is designed to measure one’s potential for abusing children (Milner, 1986). This instrument has been referenced as a research tool in the abuse literature. One of the statements on this questionnaire is “I enjoy having pets” in which the person is to state whether he or she agrees or disagrees with the statement. This particular item is on the questionnaire because it has clinical significance. In other words, there is a relationship between one enjoying or liking pets and one’s likelihood to be a child abuser.
Another instrument, which is intended to detect child behavioral problems, references animals. The Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 2-3 (CBCL) developed by Achenbach (1988) specifically asks if the person’s child is “cruel to animals” in which the person is requested to indicate how true the statement is for his or her child (0 = not true; 1 = somewhat or sometimes true; and 2 = very true or often true). In this case the child’s behavior towards animals is considered to be a valid indicator of behavioral problems which later tend to turn into conduct disorder in the teen years and antisocial disorder in the adult years.
Both of these instruments have been found to uphold high standards of reliability and validity. These instruments have been used many times as a research tool for empirical studies as well as for detecting and or predicting child behavioral problems (CBCL). It is not a coincidence that both of these instruments reference either one’s view or treatment towards animals. Although these two particular questions do not in and of themselves define an adult as an abuser or a child as one that possesses behavioral disorders, they have been found to be highly related to the dependent variable (e.g., abuse or behavioral problems).
Furthermore, there are numerous studies that provide empirical evidence of a link between animal abuse and criminal behavior in general. For example Arluke, Levin, Luke & Ascione (1999) published an article titled “The Relationship of Animal Abuse to Violence and Other Forms of Antisocial Behavior” in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, which indicates that there is an association between animal abuse and a variety of antisocial behaviors. I mention this article in particular because its methodology was very robust and the findings, I believe, are based on highly reliable and valid sources of data.
Now is a pivotal time in our society and it requires that we make a strong statement by enforcing the maximum punishment possible for the man who dragged the dog with his car. We should also consider revising the current laws so that stricter punishments may be awarded. I will provide you with two reasons why this is such:
1. Now is a time in which our society greatly suffers from an over abundance of hatred, ignorance, prejudices, etc.
2. And, although there have been many other times in history dating back hundreds of years in which the existence of cruelty and all the above can be documented, we are more sophisticated now than ever. This means that we can either use our sophistication to become most cruel and commit evil acts, or we can take our sophistication and become teachers of humane education and societal problem solvers.
Help us proponents of change and humane education activists make this a better place to live by sending out a message that cruel behavior, whether intended for humans or animals, will not be tolerated for the simple fact that it is unnecessary and terribly immoral. Please spread my message to everyone you are able to reach. Let’s face it,knowing what we know today, what these people do is extremely cruel and someone capable of committing such acts is clearly a threat to society!
Sincerely,
Dr. Jeanette Shutay Ph.d
Board Member 21st Century Animal Resource & Education Services
THE FOLLOWING IS A VERY ENERGETIC READ.
It is patently absurd and maddening to partake in religious services and witness this
disgraceful neglect and ironic distortion of the base fundamental taught in virtually
all major religions, the Golden Rule. Surely if there is a blueprint for human behavior
whether you're religious or irreligious, it's the Golden Rule! "Do Unto Others as You
Would Have Them Do Unto You!" A child could see that this applies a thousand-fold to
innocent, defenseless animals!
Perhaps too, the major religions should consider the words of Socrates, who, although
an atheist, surpassed hypocrisy with his dictum: "There is but one good, knowledge;
there is but one evil, ignorance." The more you consider that, the more profoundly it
affects you.
You may be interested in this excerpt of an email letter I sent to Rabbi Gellman and
Monsignor Hartman of "The God Squad" some months back. They work cooperatively to
address issues and are seen periodically in various media outlets. As expected, I
never heard back from them; the silence is deafening! I think many of these religious
leaders are pathetically ignorant on these issues, much as medical doctors, for so
long, were so ignorant and shamefully uninformed on nutrition issues. At least, however,
they woke up and are much more enlightened today!
"Dear Rabbi Gellman and Monsignor Hartman,
Congratulations and thanks for your Newsday article of 9/23/02 referring to the religious
significance of vegetarianism. You make some excellent points that at least demonstrate
respect and consideration for animals. I must admit however, that the absence of a strong
stand emanating from the major religions against animal cruelty and society's mind-numbing
failures to fully value and protect our animals, especially for those of us raised in
the Judeo/Christian faith, is like an ever-present ache in our hearts; a huge gap waiting
to be filled!
It is perhaps the ultimately tragic irony that humans seemingly are incapable of
perceiving what empathy and compassion for animals could mean to the entire human race.
Although the Abrahamic faiths of Judaism, Christianity and Islam may not consider animals
as having souls (respectfully, if not sacrilegiously questioned) as one priest commented
in The Tablet, "where there is love there is God." Well put! Humans experience what we
refer to as unconditional love from animals. Every day, another health benefit is reported
to be enjoyed by humans as a result of associations with animals. The fidelity of dogs to
humans is unsurpassed among all living species; yet our treatment of them compared to the
their treatment of us is a disgrace to, and a diminishment of, the human condition.
Frankly, religions are missing the boat on this issue. Consider the overwhelming and
irrefutable evidence linking animal cruelty to human violence. Those of us involved in
Humane Education consider the teaching of respect, understanding, caring and
responsibility toward animals as perhaps the greatest deterrent to violence against all
living creatures that we have. Did you ever hear of a person raised in a culture of
respect, compassion and responsible involvement with animals as becoming a serial killer?
We need a quantum leap in speaking out for animals by our religions. We don't celebrate
our great leaders who provide great insights into respect and compassion for animals
enough in our religious services, sermons and homilies. More tributes should be paid to
Gandhi, St. Francis of Assisi, Albert Schweitzer, Albert Einstein, Tolstoy, The Dalai
Lama, Isaac Bashevis, Nehru, Mark Twain, Abraham Lincoln, Adlai Stevenson, Ralph Waldo
Emerson, Rachel Carson and so many others that are rarely, if ever, referred to in
services.
Talk about a "Prayer of the Faithful"; Dr. Albert Schweitzer's quote, "until he extends
the circle of compassion to all living things, man will not himself find peace" should be
urged to be prayed, repeated, and emblazoned on every house of worship in every religion
on this planet.
Lastly, when we consider that animals, in their innocence and as defenseless co-inhab-
itants of our planet, virtually liberate us from the imprisonment of self, which we
humans are bound by with our limitations, foibles and biologically inborn selfishness,
it's all the more painful that our religions fail so miserably in taking a leadership
role in promulgating animal protection as a moral imperative and to the ennoblement of
the human condition.
Sincerely,
Joseph Pastore
Flushing, NY
FINAL CHALLENGE
I will make this impassioned challenge to all who preach, spread and share the gospel. Gather some information on you local area by speaking to your local humane society in detail: contact your local police as well. You will be amazed at the numbers and the level of abuse they witness on a daily basis in your own back yard. Find out what problems they see as crucial to the beginnings of an improved society - beginning where all larger than life projects begin - at the root level - the home.
Then bring this information to the pulpit one Sunday in the future. Clearly outline that much of what we do TO our animals are certainly not beneficial to their existence - such as tying them to a fence post. Locking them outside in small cages or pens. The unnecessary restrictions these dogs suffer from, lack of social interaction and exercise and extreme temperatures lends itself to uncontrollable behavior and attacks, medical problems that are usually noticed too late, unwanted litters - adding to the already overwhelming number of slaughters seen in this country.
This leads to a life of neglect, illness and other problems caused by the treatment by humans - resulting in a life span that is 7 years less than a dog who sleeps inside the home at night and has proper exercise. I'm talking about this community where EVERYONE has their dog on a short chain outside. Between coyotes, rattlesnakes scorpions and
heat strokes, you can see a home change dogs once a year or more. but they get the next little puppy and tie it to the same chain. Your community will have similar challenges.
With all the studies that are out now on so many matters, these issues are clearly no longer ones of personal opinion, but moreso those of right and wrong. These people are wrong. the churches could and should step in, give details and speak out.
Have a list of do's and don'ts for the congregation to take with them. Many argue that it is their right to do this and to do that. It is NOT anyone's right to cause harm to an animal. .
It's clear there will be animals in heaven as there were animals in the Garden of Eden. So, when we see clearly that abuse is current in our very own congregations, why does the church choose to ignore them here on earth? Remember, '.....not a sparrow shall fall from the sky....."?
Dogs are more of a role model than we give them credit for. If we learn to listen to the voices of our pets, it will enhance our emotional and spiritual growth as well as give new meaning to the phrase, "Man's Best Friend'
Readings for your sermon and Sunday School Classes:
IMPORTANCE OF HUMANE EDUCATION by Dr. Jeanette Shutay Ph.d
http://www.21stcenturycares.org/hcy.htm
http://www.21stcenturycares.org/freekits.htm
http://www.21stcenturycares.org/petsinheaven.htm
http://www.21stcenturycares.org/istole.htm
http://www.21stcenturycares.org/truestory.htm
Randy N. Warner
Email 21stcares@gmail.com
21ST CENTURY ANIMAL RESOURCE & EDUCATION SERVICES, INC.
TEN COMMANDMENTS OF ANIMAL GUARDIANSHIP
1. When you adopt me, remember that my life is likely to last 15 or more years.
That is your responsibility to care for me during that period of time - NOT to dump me
at the pound or on some unsuspecting acquaintance.
2. Please give me time to understand what it is you want from me. Change can be
more difficult for me than for you. I don't speak your language and need time.
3. Please don't be angry with me for a long time, and don't lock me up alone as
punishment Do not throw me outside forever nor tie me to a post.
I need exercise. love and I need these things from you. You have your human family, your friends,
your entertainment and I ONLY HAVE YOU!!!
4. Please trust me and help me to trust you .. . . it is crucial for
mine as well as your well being.
5. Talk to me . . . even if you think I don't understand your words I
understand your voice and love it when you speak to me and stroke me.
6. Before you hit me remember that I have teeth and claws and could
easily hurt you but I choose not to bite and scratch you because I love you..
Also, remember that each time you strike me, it is only an admission on your part that you have failed once again to do what's necessary to communicate.
7. Be aware, that however you treat me, I WILL NEVER FORGET!!!
8. Before you scold me for being uncooperative or bad, ask yourself if
maybe something is wrong and there is another reason for my behavior.
Perhaps I am sick, hot, old or just plain tired, frustrated and weak.
PLEASE TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS LIKE TO BE ME AND PUT YOURSELF IN MY
PLACE.
9. Please take care of me when I get old and don't abandon me, for you
too will grow old. Please notice when I am ill because I need you to take
me to the vet for help when I am ill just as you need to see a doctor.
10. Go with me on the most difficult journeys. Never say, "I can't bear to
watch" or "Do it when I leave" because I need you with me even at the end of
my journeys. Please always do what is best for me even if it is unbearable
for you to do so because I love you and trust that you will.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)